Measurement

  • by Larry Lesser

    Suppose 50 people are randomly chosen
    And asked "Do you fancy this yogurt that's frozen?"
    50 is viewed as the size of our sample;
    It’s not to be viewed as a variable’s value.
    What's one guy's answer? Well, that's not rhetorical;
    It is a variable that's categorical.

    The way you can view it, the way you can know:
    Each person we surveyed says 'yes' or a 'no'.
    Of course, you could tally each label's amounts
    For a summ'ry statistic from each of the counts.
    But that doesn't mean that a variable’s numerical;
    Each value's a category whose tallies are clerical.

    We know that a variable is very able
    To yield useful data all in a nice table,
    But we must assert categorically
    Variable type is important, you see,
    To know just what summ'ries and tools you can use
    So bar graphs and histograms won't be confused!

  • Every careful measurement in science is always given with the probable error... every observer admits that he is likely wrong, and knows about how much wrong he is likely to be.

    Bertrand A.W. Russell (1872 - 1970)

  • If you can't measure it, I'm not interested.

    Laurence J. Peter (1919 - 1990)

  • It is easy to lie with statistics, but it is easier to lie without them.

    Frederick Mosteller (1916 - 2006)

  • ... statistics - whatever their mathematical sophistication and elegance - cannot make bad variables into good ones.

    H.T. Reynolds

  • ... we must remember that measures were made for man and not man for measures.

    Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)

Pages

register