Difference between revisions of "Sandbox"

From ChanceWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
[http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/19/opinion/19berkley.html?scp=1&sq=seth%20berkley&st New York Times]
 
[http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/19/opinion/19berkley.html?scp=1&sq=seth%20berkley&st New York Times]
OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR
+
OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR<r>
Have Faith in an AIDS Vaccine
+
Have Faith in an AIDS Vaccine<b
 
 
SIGN IN TO RECOMMEND
 
TWITTER
 
SIGN IN TO E-MAIL
 
PRINT
 
SHARE
 
CLOSE
 
 
   
 
   
 
By SETH BERKLEY
 
By SETH BERKLEY

Revision as of 16:04, 24 October 2009

This illustrates why the controversy over statistical significance is exaggerated. Whether you consider the first or second analysis, the observed effect of the Thai candidates was either just above or below the level of statistical significance. Statisticians will tell you it is possible to observe an effect and have reason to think it’s real even if it’s not statistically significant. And if you think it’s real, you ought to examine it carefully.

New York Times OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR<r> Have Faith in an AIDS Vaccine<b

By SETH BERKLEY