Difference between revisions of "Sandbox"

From ChanceWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 6: Line 6:
 
<blockquote>Is Texas Hold ‘Em poker more a game of chance or of skill? That question has figured in several legal tests of playing the card game for money: Games of chance are considered gambling under U.S. law. Now a major poker Web site has sponsored a study it claims demonstrates that it takes skill to win — which would help the site’s legal standing. But several poker experts question that claim.<blockquote>
 
<blockquote>Is Texas Hold ‘Em poker more a game of chance or of skill? That question has figured in several legal tests of playing the card game for money: Games of chance are considered gambling under U.S. law. Now a major poker Web site has sponsored a study it claims demonstrates that it takes skill to win — which would help the site’s legal standing. But several poker experts question that claim.<blockquote>
  
We have discussed this problem in [http://chance.dartmouth.edu/chancewiki/index.php/Chance_News_29 ] and in lhttp://chance.dartmouth.edu/chancewiki/index.php/Chance_News_30]
+
We have discussed this problem in [http://chance.dartmouth.edu/chancewiki/index.php/Chance_News_29 ] and in [http://chance.dartmouth.edu/chancewiki/index.php/Chance_News_30]

Revision as of 19:37, 3 April 2009

Poker Showdown Between Luck and Skill

Carl Bialik write a column called "The Numbers Guy" for the Wall Street Journal and keeps his column on the internet here

He writes

Is Texas Hold ‘Em poker more a game of chance or of skill? That question has figured in several legal tests of playing the card game for money: Games of chance are considered gambling under U.S. law. Now a major poker Web site has sponsored a study it claims demonstrates that it takes skill to win — which would help the site’s legal standing. But several poker experts question that claim.

We have discussed this problem in [1] and in [2]