Sandbox: Difference between revisions

From ChanceWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Game Theory Explains Why You Can't Hurry Love.<br>
Annette Georgey wrote to the [ence.edu/fast/jordanj/isostat.html Isolated Statisticans]
 
 
[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123301860344617927.html?mod=todays_us_nonsub_pj article]
came out in today's Wall St. Journal that would be fun to use for introductory stats classes.  It touches on several concepts--the limits of observational studies, confounding, spurious correlations, type I errors.


<blockquote>From a female's point of view, males are not all equal and there remains some risk that she will mate with the wrong type of male. She cannot eliminate this risk completely unless she decides never to mate.</blockquote>


<div align=right>Dr Peter Sozou<br> Warwick Medical School and <br>LSE Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science.<br> Quoted in [http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/01/090116073603.htm Science Daily] <br>Commenting upon [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B6WMD-4TN0M36-4-C&_cdi=6932&_user=10&_orig=browse&_coverDate=01%2F07%2F2009&_sk=997439998&view=c&wchp=dGLbVzb-zSkzV&md5=cb988507dccb7fe86d0506797601aa94&ie=/sdarticle.pdf here]
</div>
.


==You are what your mother eats.==


Annette Georgey wrote to the [ence.edu/fast/jordanj/isostat.html Isolated Statisticans]
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123301860344617927.html?mod=todays_us_nonsub_pj
Does Breakfast Cereal Affect a Baby's Gender?
 
 
Here we will have a discussion of an [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123301860344617927.html?mod=todays_us_nonsub_pjhttp://online.wsj.com/article/SB123301860344617927.html?mod=todays_us_nonsub_pj article] in the  Wall Street Journal
 
which is based on [http://journals.royalsociety.org/content/w260687441pp64w5/fulltext.pdf/ an article]"You are what your mother eats"  in the Proceedings of the Royal Society and on a [http://journals.royalsociety.org/content/u12p544020045241/fulltext.pdf criticism of this article]: "Cereal-Induced gender selection? Most likely a multiple testing false positive" in the same journal.


You might want to read these articles before we figure out something wise to say about the articles.


[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123301860344617927.html?mod=todays_us_nonsub_pj article]
To be continued.
came out in today's Wall St. Journal that would be fun to use for introductory stats classes.  It touches on several concepts--the limits of observational studies, confounding, spurious correlations, type I errors.


Submitted by Laurie Snell





Revision as of 02:03, 31 January 2009

Annette Georgey wrote to the [ence.edu/fast/jordanj/isostat.html Isolated Statisticans]


article

came out in today's Wall St. Journal that would be fun to use for introductory stats classes.  It touches on several concepts--the limits of observational studies, confounding, spurious correlations, type I errors.



http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123301860344617927.html?mod=todays_us_nonsub_pj Does Breakfast Cereal Affect a Baby's Gender?


Here we will have a discussion of an article in the Wall Street Journal

which is based on an article"You are what your mother eats" in the Proceedings of the Royal Society and on a criticism of this article: "Cereal-Induced gender selection? Most likely a multiple testing false positive" in the same journal.

You might want to read these articles before we figure out something wise to say about the articles.

To be continued.

Submitted by Laurie Snell


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123301860344617927.html?mod=todays_us_nonsub_pj Does Breakfast Cereal Affect a Baby's Gender?


Here we will have a discussion of an article in the Wall Street Journal

which is based on an article"You are what your mother eats" in the Proceedings of the Royal Society and on a criticism of this article: "Cereal-Induced gender selection? Most likely a multiple testing false positive" in the same journal.

You might want to read these articles before we figure out something wise to say about the articles.

To be continued.

Submitted by Laurie Snell