Sandbox: Difference between revisions

From ChanceWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
<blockquote>An [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123301860344617927.html?mod=todays_us_nonsub_pj article] came out in today's Wall St. Journal that would be fun to use for introductory stats classes.  It touches on several concepts--the limits of observational studies, confounding, spurious correlations, type I errors.</blockquote>
<blockquote>An [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123301860344617927.html?mod=todays_us_nonsub_pj article] came out in today's Wall St. Journal that would be fun to use for introductory stats classes.  It touches on several concepts--the limits of observational studies, confounding, spurious correlations, type I errors.</blockquote>


The author, Melinda Beck, usas as example an article  
The author, Melinda Beck, usas as example an article an article [http://journals.royalsociety.org/content/w260687441pp64w5/fulltext.pdf/ an article]"You are what your mother eats"  in the Proceedings of the Royal Society




Line 16: Line 16:
Here we will have a discussion of an [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123301860344617927.html?mod=todays_us_nonsub_pjhttp://online.wsj.com/article/SB123301860344617927.html?mod=todays_us_nonsub_pj article] in the  Wall Street Journal  
Here we will have a discussion of an [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123301860344617927.html?mod=todays_us_nonsub_pjhttp://online.wsj.com/article/SB123301860344617927.html?mod=todays_us_nonsub_pj article] in the  Wall Street Journal  


which is based on [http://journals.royalsociety.org/content/w260687441pp64w5/fulltext.pdf/ an article]"You are what your mother eats" in the Proceedings of the Royal Society and on a [http://journals.royalsociety.org/content/u12p544020045241/fulltext.pdf criticism of this article]: "Cereal-Induced gender selection? Most likely a multiple testing false positive" in the same journal.
which is based on  and on a [http://journals.royalsociety.org/content/u12p544020045241/fulltext.pdf criticism of this article]: "Cereal-Induced gender selection? Most likely a multiple testing false positive" in the same journal.


You might want to read these articles before we figure out something wise to say about the articles.
You might want to read these articles before we figure out something wise to say about the articles.

Revision as of 02:27, 31 January 2009

Does Bran Make the Man? What Statistics Really Tell Us

Annette Georgey wrote to the Isolated Statisticans

An article came out in today's Wall St. Journal that would be fun to use for introductory stats classes. It touches on several concepts--the limits of observational studies, confounding, spurious correlations, type I errors.

The author, Melinda Beck, usas as example an article an article an article"You are what your mother eats" in the Proceedings of the Royal Society



[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123301860344617927.html?mod=todays_us_nonsub_pj Does Breakfast Cereal Affect a Baby's Gender?]


Here we will have a discussion of an article in the Wall Street Journal

which is based on and on a criticism of this article: "Cereal-Induced gender selection? Most likely a multiple testing false positive" in the same journal.

You might want to read these articles before we figure out something wise to say about the articles.

To be continued.

Submitted by Laurie Snell


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123301860344617927.html?mod=todays_us_nonsub_pj Does Breakfast Cereal Affect a Baby's Gender?


Here we will have a discussion of an article in the Wall Street Journal

which is based on an article"You are what your mother eats" in the Proceedings of the Royal Society and on a criticism of this article: "Cereal-Induced gender selection? Most likely a multiple testing false positive" in the same journal.

You might want to read these articles before we figure out something wise to say about the articles.

To be continued.

Submitted by Laurie Snell