Sandbox: Difference between revisions
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Pressing issue? | ==The Oxford comma: A Pressing issue? == | ||
[http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/elitist-superfluous-or-popular-we-polled-americans-on-the-oxford-comma/ Elitist, superfluous, Or popular? We polled Americans on the Oxford comma]<br> | [http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/elitist-superfluous-or-popular-we-polled-americans-on-the-oxford-comma/ Elitist, superfluous, Or popular? We polled Americans on the Oxford comma]<br> | ||
By Walt Hickey, ''FiveThirtyEight'', 17June 2014 | By Walt Hickey, ''FiveThirtyEight'', 17June 2014 | ||
A grammatical point of controversy: should you use a comma before the "and" in a list of | A grammatical point of controversy: should you use a comma before the "and" in a list of more than two items? The example used in the article is: | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
We asked respondents which sentence was, in their opinion, more grammatically correct: “It’s important for a person to be honest, kind and loyal.” Or: “It’s important for a person to be honest, kind, and loyal.” The latter has an Oxford comma, the former none. | We asked respondents which sentence was, in their opinion, more grammatically correct: “It’s important for a person to be honest, kind and loyal.” Or: “It’s important for a person to be honest, kind, and loyal.” The latter has an Oxford comma, the former none. | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
Here are the results: | |||
<center>[[File:Hickey-OxfordComma.png | 500px]]</center> | <center>[[File:Hickey-OxfordComma.png | 500px]]</center> | ||
Revision as of 19:06, 14 July 2014
The Oxford comma: A Pressing issue?
Elitist, superfluous, Or popular? We polled Americans on the Oxford comma
By Walt Hickey, FiveThirtyEight, 17June 2014
A grammatical point of controversy: should you use a comma before the "and" in a list of more than two items? The example used in the article is:
We asked respondents which sentence was, in their opinion, more grammatically correct: “It’s important for a person to be honest, kind and loyal.” Or: “It’s important for a person to be honest, kind, and loyal.” The latter has an Oxford comma, the former none.
Here are the results:
Submitted by Paul Alper
Reproducibility
When studies are wrong: A coda
by George Johnson, New York Times, 7 March 2014
Submitted by Bill Peterson
Finding lost aircraft
How statisticians found Air France Flight 447 two years after it crashed into Atlantic
MIT Technology Review, 27 May 2014
How statisticians could help find that missing plane, by Carl Bialik, FiveThirtyEight, 17 March 2014
Missing Malaysia Airlines jet shines spotlight on tracking technology
Submitted by Jeanne Aolbert