Difference between revisions of "Chance News 77"

From ChanceWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "==Quotations== ==Forsooth== ==Item 1== ==Item 2==")
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
==Forsooth==
 
==Forsooth==
  
==Item 1==
+
==What is the payoff for high tech education==
 +
 
 +
[http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/04/technology/technology-in-schools-faces-questions-on-value.html In Classroom of Future, Stagnant Scores] by Matt Richtel, The New York Times, September 3, 2011.
 +
 
 +
Technology has changed how we teach our children.
 +
 
 +
<blockquote>Amy Furman, a seventh-grade English teacher here, roams among 31 students sitting at their desks or in clumps on the floor. They’re studying Shakespeare’s “As You Like It” — but not in any traditional way. In this technology-centric classroom, students are bent over laptops, some blogging or building Facebook pages from the perspective of Shakespeare’s characters. One student compiles a song list from the Internet, picking a tune by the rapper Kanye West to express the emotions of Shakespeare’s lovelorn Silvius.</blockquote>
 +
 
 +
<blockquote>The class, and the Kyrene School District as a whole, offer what some see as a utopian vision of education’s future. Classrooms are decked out with laptops, big interactive screens and software that drills students on every basic subject. Under a ballot initiative approved in 2005, the district has invested roughly $33 million in such technologies. </blockquote>
 +
 
 +
These technology upgrades arebeing implemented in many other school districts. The problem is that all this investment in technology does not appear to have any pay off.
 +
 
 +
<blockquote>Since 2005, scores in reading and math have stagnated in Kyrene, even as statewide scores have risen. To be sure, test scores can go up or down for many reasons. But to many education experts, something is not adding up — here and across the country. In a nutshell: schools are spending billions on technology, even as they cut budgets and lay off teachers, with little proof that this approach is improving basic learning. </blockquote>
  
 
==Item 2==
 
==Item 2==

Revision as of 17:34, 7 September 2011

Quotations

Forsooth

What is the payoff for high tech education

In Classroom of Future, Stagnant Scores by Matt Richtel, The New York Times, September 3, 2011.

Technology has changed how we teach our children.

Amy Furman, a seventh-grade English teacher here, roams among 31 students sitting at their desks or in clumps on the floor. They’re studying Shakespeare’s “As You Like It” — but not in any traditional way. In this technology-centric classroom, students are bent over laptops, some blogging or building Facebook pages from the perspective of Shakespeare’s characters. One student compiles a song list from the Internet, picking a tune by the rapper Kanye West to express the emotions of Shakespeare’s lovelorn Silvius.

The class, and the Kyrene School District as a whole, offer what some see as a utopian vision of education’s future. Classrooms are decked out with laptops, big interactive screens and software that drills students on every basic subject. Under a ballot initiative approved in 2005, the district has invested roughly $33 million in such technologies.

These technology upgrades arebeing implemented in many other school districts. The problem is that all this investment in technology does not appear to have any pay off.

Since 2005, scores in reading and math have stagnated in Kyrene, even as statewide scores have risen. To be sure, test scores can go up or down for many reasons. But to many education experts, something is not adding up — here and across the country. In a nutshell: schools are spending billions on technology, even as they cut budgets and lay off teachers, with little proof that this approach is improving basic learning.

Item 2