Chance News 67: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Simon66217 (talk | contribs) (→Item 1) |
Simon66217 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==More fuel for the controversy over mammograms== | ==More fuel for the controversy over mammograms== | ||
[http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/30/health/research/30mammogram.html Mammogram Benefit Seen for Women in Their 40s] | [http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/30/health/research/30mammogram.html Mammogram Benefit Seen for Women in Their 40s], Gina Kolata, The New York Times, September 29, 2010. | ||
One of the most contentious debates in medicine is whether mammograms are beneficial to women between 40 and 50 years old. earlier commentaries about this controversy appear in [http://www.causeweb.org/wiki/chance/index.php/Chance_News_8#Mammograms_Validated_as_Key_in_Cancer_Fight Chance News 8], [http://www.causeweb.org/wiki/chance/index.php/Chance_News_14#Gerd_Gigerenzer.27s_Calculated_Risks_Revisited Chance News 14], | |||
==Item 2== | ==Item 2== | ||
Revision as of 19:21, 30 September 2010
Quotations
Forsooth
More fuel for the controversy over mammograms
Mammogram Benefit Seen for Women in Their 40s, Gina Kolata, The New York Times, September 29, 2010.
One of the most contentious debates in medicine is whether mammograms are beneficial to women between 40 and 50 years old. earlier commentaries about this controversy appear in Chance News 8, Chance News 14,