Chance News 61: Difference between revisions

From ChanceWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 30: Line 30:
| > 10 cm || 58.8%
| > 10 cm || 58.8%
|}
|}
 
</center>
<p>
<center>
{|class=wikitable border="1"  
{|class=wikitable border="1"  
| '''Avg. Height of Perpetrator''' || '''Avg. Height of Victim'''
| '''Avg. Height of Perpetrator''' || '''Avg. Height of Victim'''

Revision as of 02:42, 12 February 2010

Quotations

Forsooth

Census errors

Can you trust Census data?
Freakonomics blog, New York Times, 2 February 2010
Justin Wolfers

Bureau obscured personal data—Too well, some say
Numbers Guy blog, Wall Street Journal, 6 February 2010
Carl Bialik

To be continued...

Submitted by Bill Peterson

Height bias or data dredging?

Soccer referees hate the tall guys
Wall Street Journal, 8 Feburary 2010

According to the article, "Niels van Quaquebeke and Steffen R. Giessner, researchers at Erasmus University in Rotterdam, compiled refereeing data from seven seasons of the German Bundesliga and the UEFA Champions League, as well as three World Cups (123,844 fouls in total)" and found:

Height Difference Probability of Foul Against Taller Player
1-5 cm 52.0%
6-10 cm 55.4%
> 10 cm 58.8%

Avg. Height of Perpetrator Avg. Height of Victim
182.4 cm 181.5 cm

Note that the height difference on average is only 0.9 cm!

To be continued... Submitted by Paul Alper