Chance News 61: Difference between revisions

From ChanceWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
==Census errors==
==Census errors==
[http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/02/can-you-trust-census-data/ Can you trust Census data?]<br>
[http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/02/can-you-trust-census-data/ Can you trust Census data?]<br>
Freakonomics Blog, New York Times, 2 February 2010<br>
Freakonomics blog, New York Times, 2 February 2010<br>
Justin Wolfers  
Justin Wolfers  


[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748704533204575047241321811712.htmlCensus Bureau obscured personal data—Too well, some say]<br>
[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748704533204575047241321811712.htmlCensus Bureau obscured personal data—Too well, some say]<br>
Numbers Guy Blog, Wall Street Journal, 6 February 2010<br>
Numbers Guy blog, Wall Street Journal, 6 February 2010<br>
Care Bialik
Care Bialik


To be continued.
To be continued...
 
Submitted by Bill Peterson
Submitted by Bill Peterson


== Item2==
== Item2==

Revision as of 02:05, 12 February 2010

Quotations

Forsooth

Census errors

Can you trust Census data?
Freakonomics blog, New York Times, 2 February 2010
Justin Wolfers

Bureau obscured personal data—Too well, some say
Numbers Guy blog, Wall Street Journal, 6 February 2010
Care Bialik

To be continued...

Submitted by Bill Peterson

Item2