Sandbox: Difference between revisions

From ChanceWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
by Graham Readfearn, ''Guardian'', Planet Oz blog
by Graham Readfearn, ''Guardian'', Planet Oz blog


<center> [[File:http://test.causeweb.org/wiki/chance/images/3/37/Sks_abstracts.jpg]] </center>
<center> [[File:Sks_abstracts.jpg]] </center>


* "Like a cardiac monitor warning of a soon-to-be lifeless patient, for more than 20 years the red line hovers around zero showing barely a flicker of life."
* "Like a cardiac monitor warning of a soon-to-be lifeless patient, for more than 20 years the red line hovers around zero showing barely a flicker of life."

Revision as of 18:04, 2 June 2013

Anthropogenic global warming

Zombie climate sceptic theories survive only in newspapers and on TV
by Graham Readfearn, Guardian, Planet Oz blog

Sks abstracts.jpg
  • "Like a cardiac monitor warning of a soon-to-be lifeless patient, for more than 20 years the red line hovers around zero showing barely a flicker of life."
  • "[John] Cook says they expected to see a rising number of papers which had 'no position' and didn't feel the need to state the obvious 'just as geographers find no reason to remind readers that the earth is round'".
  • "In other words, the alternative arguments about the causes of global warming were already dead or dying 20 years ago. Yet since then, climate science contrarians/deniers/sceptics have continually applied the defibrillator paddles to these failing theories in an attempt to bring them back to life."
  • "So after giving up on the peer-reviewed literature, the climate science contrarians – often bolstered by support from the fossil fuel industry and free-market idealogues - took their talking points somewhere else. That is, out into the public domain, the mainstream media and the blogosphere and far away from the less forgiving operating theatre of peer-reviewed science journals."

Submitted by Paul Alper